Was a scientific study really necessary?

Gaze 'key to facial attraction'


You can alter your attraction to the opposite sex simply by looking straight at them and smiling, research suggests.

A study of hundreds of volunteers at Stirling and Aberdeen Universities found averting the eyes even a fraction can make you appear less attractive.

In the Royal Society's Proceedings B journal, they say the direction of gaze plays a role alongside a symmetrical face or healthy skin.

An expert said it may stop people wasting energy on pointless courtships.

The study used pictures of male and female faces which had been subtly digitally manipulated.

In one picture, a woman might be looking straight at the camera, while in the next, a tiny adjustment meant she would be looking marginally to the left or right.

The difference was so small that it was not immediately obvious to the viewer.

However, after these pictures were shown to 460 men and women, who were asked to rate them for "attractiveness", it became clear that it was having a pronounced subliminal effect.

In some pictures, there was an eight-fold difference in ratings between the "straight to camera" and averted gazes.

While many studies have found links between face shape, expression and other physical "cues" to attraction, this is one of the first to look in more detail at the direction of gaze.

The researchers wrote: "Mating effort is a finite resource that should be allocated judiciously, and preferences for direct gaze in opposite-sex faces would increase the likelihood of allocating mating effort to potential mates who are most likely to reciprocate."

Success stakes

One of the paper's authors, Dr Claire Conway, said: "People prefer faces that appear to 'like' them, showing that attraction is not simply about physical beauty."

Professor Ruth Mace, a researcher into evolutionary anthropology at University College London, said that while this seemed an obvious principle, it could be a sign of evolution at work.

She said: "It's a pretty clear signal whether a person is interested in you or whether you are wasting your time.

"But it suggests that how attractive you find someone is governed partly by how likely you are to be successful."

Click to expand...

ketostix said:

The why is it when you have your pictures taken professionally the photographer usually tells you to not look directly at the camera?

Click to expand...

Phyzzle said:

Red eye?

Nonetheless . . . retarded study. The eyes were DIGITALLY MANIPULATED to gaze away.

So, uh, how do you know that the entire effect wasn't a result of people reacting to the tiny digital manipulation?

I've said it before: professional social scientists are very often tards. They are the people who couldn't handle real science in their freshman year at college.

Click to expand...

ketostix said:

Even if they had controlled for that variable of digital manipulation, I still don't think they could've came to song strong and broad conclusion they did. About the best thing that could be conclusion that could be drawn is, If you want your pictures you post online to be the most attractive, gaze directly at the camera or viewer .

Click to expand...