Women are FANATICAL about diet. Men can be too. Not that diet doesn't matter. What we put into our body determines what we get out of it, how it's built over time, what type of health we can expect, what types of diseases we can expect to contract and harbor, and so on.
But ultimately our bodies are built for UTILITY. For us. For activity. Even if it's 15 minutes of bodyweight exercises, or 1hr of walking, DOING something NOT related to work is ideally better than JUST focusing on diet alone.
Diet alone, while that's well and good, negates that we LOSE WHAT we don't USE. Older people find themselves with osteoporosis because they don't use their muscles, flex their tendons and ligaments, and remain constantly active. When it's not used, the body folds up shop and shuts down. Then you have the uphill battle of reinstalling or rebuilding that, or in other words what is known as ATROPHY.
Yet, diet alone won't determine the COMPOSITION of our body. What you put in DETERMINES its composition BASED on activity, but a LOW carb diet with NO activity will not yield six pack abs. A moderate carb diet with HIGH Protein and Fat with strong activity levels WILL. It's the simple. It isn't magic. Too many people in America focus on diet. What you should realize is, if you ate your MAINTENANCE calories and did some type of activity daily, you'd get leaner and stronger. And that's just the basics. People really don't have to be fat, but preferenced over activity is INACTIVITY. Inactive pursuits provide more mental masturbation and pleasure than activity, at least initially. Anybody who has been on a team of intramural sports KNOWS the fun comes over the duration of play. I've tried and still try different activities as I go along, all along lifting and engaging in some sport. Not only b/c of my young age, but b/c we SHOULD, we're supposed to. As we age, it's only ACCEPTANCE of a weaker position that people age earlier and get fatter than they have to. Just look at Jack LeLane for any testament you need to that fact.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I mentioned women FIRST, because they attempt (many of them) to eat like rabbits, yet never really working out. Some walk, or do cardio, and then lose what muscle they have (and curves), because they're working out while also eating very little. What they eat LACKS protein and good fats, so it's a constant spiral of a further degrading and sickening body. Duh, that's also why women experience wide fluctuations in temperature (excluding menopause), and also have worse body composition than men in most cases. Normally they fear any type of strength workouts that "might" add size or bulk as they perceive it to their body, but don't realize the missing benefits of what they'd gain by doing it. Cardio is a favorite of women b/c it's perceived to LEAN you up. But being lean is worse than being slightly bulky WITH muscle and curves, and what provides curves are the muscles. The fat is like a STRETCHY CAR cover, but it's the CAR under it that provides the great looking shell you see.
Diet + Activity matter. Diet ENHANCES the activity. Of course if you eat MORE than your calories required daily (depending on your goal), then you won't lose, but gain. You may alter, depending on the macro nutrient composition. A low carb diet, coupled with high fat and hight protein and much lifting and walking will lean you out. Initially weight would be water, because water clings to carbs. But over time, less carbs, yield less water, therefore less weight, and in time, fat burning is switched on b/c the body switches internal systems, going from carbs as a semi-source of energy, to fat as a FULL source of energy. However, it's a tough way to live, with many opps to cheat and flounder, and I personally can't and wouldn't remain SUPER low for that long. It's far too easy to fall of the train, and now and then you want to INDULGE, esp if you're one who is very active.
Activity matters more because DIETING is easy to fail on. The biggest resolution, and the biggest "i'm going to start money" mentioned, is DIET. People thinking they'd ditch their bad habits, which are HARDER to alter than ADDING more activity of any kind. That doesn't mean that you can eat the pint of ice cream, but it does mean if you're active, you can erase some of the calories you consumed that you shouldn't have.
And there aren't perfect activities. Each benefit in their own ways. My opinion is of being WELL ROUNDED. What is good strength if you haven't the speed, agility, or stamina to use it? In the flag football I play in, strength is of now use except as a SPRINT. If you can't run, can't jive, shuck, and move, then it's no good. So you're workouting should be tailored to FUNCTION, as well as AESHETICS. You obviously want to look good and building muscle does this more and better than anything else. The bigger question before you define the SPECIFIC program you use is HOW OFTEN CAN I LIFT AND STILL GAIN WEIGHT/IMPROVE? Can you lift twice a week or 6 times a week? Some guys can split the body up and 5 days, 1 part each day. Yet others can only lift twice a week, as I'd only been able to do most of my life. Whatever it is, THAT COMES first. Though a guy says he's succeeded doing one workout, still another might need more or less recuperation depending on genetics.
Once that's determined THEN try different programs from 6-12 weeks, that are likely to be broken down WITHIN those periods, as well.
But activity OVER all else will benefit, whether it's martial arts, swimming, biking, rowing, running, walking, climbing, intramural sports, lifting, etc, it doesn't matter. DO IT FREQUENTLY.
*Activity will burn more calories and fact. Active muscle and weight burns more than standing, stagnant muscle and fat.
*It releases hormones that trigger happiness and rid the body of free radicals floating around.
*It will erase any bad calories you have during the week.
*It burns MORE fat than just focusing on diet alone.
*It breaks you free from concern of what you eat, whereas diet leaves you as a Richard Simmons psycho, overly concerned of each morsel of food.
*It prepares you for activity, keeps you strong and nimble.
*It gives you a body to be proud of. Diet alone can't do it. And without activity, your overall body composition is constantly dependent upon what you consume daily, thereby giving you NO control over what the outcome is. In the short-run, you can determine your mainteance weight, but parties, holidays, and binges will throw you off enough to alter the APPLE CART faster than you would have it doing ACTIVITY + DIET.
*It Preserves muscle. It's misinformation that activity will burn muscle so easily. Any CALORIE deficit splits calories consumed by 75% fat, and 25% lean muscle. So if you're seeking to gain, 75% will be fat, 25% lean muscle, and perhaps some water that throws the numbers off. If you're losing, you're losing water, then fat at around 75%, and 25% lean muscle. The exact numbers are indeterminant in an absolute fashion, it's close to those %. Muscle takes MORE time to build, and to rip off. Whereas fat takes LESS time to build and rip. Altering body composition isn't entirely difficult, but it does take time to build muscle.
*Active muscle burns massive calories. Standing muscle hardly burns any. It's misinformation that muscle burns THAT much calories to turn you into a FAT burning furnace. Activity is the greatest furnace, and your ORGANS, SKIN, HEART, BLOOD, INTESTINES, etc, burn MORE calories keeping you ALIVE, than your muscle does resting. But when you USE the muscle, you're also using the organs of the body, and NOW you're burning LOTS of calories.
A-Unit
But ultimately our bodies are built for UTILITY. For us. For activity. Even if it's 15 minutes of bodyweight exercises, or 1hr of walking, DOING something NOT related to work is ideally better than JUST focusing on diet alone.
Diet alone, while that's well and good, negates that we LOSE WHAT we don't USE. Older people find themselves with osteoporosis because they don't use their muscles, flex their tendons and ligaments, and remain constantly active. When it's not used, the body folds up shop and shuts down. Then you have the uphill battle of reinstalling or rebuilding that, or in other words what is known as ATROPHY.
Yet, diet alone won't determine the COMPOSITION of our body. What you put in DETERMINES its composition BASED on activity, but a LOW carb diet with NO activity will not yield six pack abs. A moderate carb diet with HIGH Protein and Fat with strong activity levels WILL. It's the simple. It isn't magic. Too many people in America focus on diet. What you should realize is, if you ate your MAINTENANCE calories and did some type of activity daily, you'd get leaner and stronger. And that's just the basics. People really don't have to be fat, but preferenced over activity is INACTIVITY. Inactive pursuits provide more mental masturbation and pleasure than activity, at least initially. Anybody who has been on a team of intramural sports KNOWS the fun comes over the duration of play. I've tried and still try different activities as I go along, all along lifting and engaging in some sport. Not only b/c of my young age, but b/c we SHOULD, we're supposed to. As we age, it's only ACCEPTANCE of a weaker position that people age earlier and get fatter than they have to. Just look at Jack LeLane for any testament you need to that fact.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I mentioned women FIRST, because they attempt (many of them) to eat like rabbits, yet never really working out. Some walk, or do cardio, and then lose what muscle they have (and curves), because they're working out while also eating very little. What they eat LACKS protein and good fats, so it's a constant spiral of a further degrading and sickening body. Duh, that's also why women experience wide fluctuations in temperature (excluding menopause), and also have worse body composition than men in most cases. Normally they fear any type of strength workouts that "might" add size or bulk as they perceive it to their body, but don't realize the missing benefits of what they'd gain by doing it. Cardio is a favorite of women b/c it's perceived to LEAN you up. But being lean is worse than being slightly bulky WITH muscle and curves, and what provides curves are the muscles. The fat is like a STRETCHY CAR cover, but it's the CAR under it that provides the great looking shell you see.
Diet + Activity matter. Diet ENHANCES the activity. Of course if you eat MORE than your calories required daily (depending on your goal), then you won't lose, but gain. You may alter, depending on the macro nutrient composition. A low carb diet, coupled with high fat and hight protein and much lifting and walking will lean you out. Initially weight would be water, because water clings to carbs. But over time, less carbs, yield less water, therefore less weight, and in time, fat burning is switched on b/c the body switches internal systems, going from carbs as a semi-source of energy, to fat as a FULL source of energy. However, it's a tough way to live, with many opps to cheat and flounder, and I personally can't and wouldn't remain SUPER low for that long. It's far too easy to fall of the train, and now and then you want to INDULGE, esp if you're one who is very active.
Activity matters more because DIETING is easy to fail on. The biggest resolution, and the biggest "i'm going to start money" mentioned, is DIET. People thinking they'd ditch their bad habits, which are HARDER to alter than ADDING more activity of any kind. That doesn't mean that you can eat the pint of ice cream, but it does mean if you're active, you can erase some of the calories you consumed that you shouldn't have.
And there aren't perfect activities. Each benefit in their own ways. My opinion is of being WELL ROUNDED. What is good strength if you haven't the speed, agility, or stamina to use it? In the flag football I play in, strength is of now use except as a SPRINT. If you can't run, can't jive, shuck, and move, then it's no good. So you're workouting should be tailored to FUNCTION, as well as AESHETICS. You obviously want to look good and building muscle does this more and better than anything else. The bigger question before you define the SPECIFIC program you use is HOW OFTEN CAN I LIFT AND STILL GAIN WEIGHT/IMPROVE? Can you lift twice a week or 6 times a week? Some guys can split the body up and 5 days, 1 part each day. Yet others can only lift twice a week, as I'd only been able to do most of my life. Whatever it is, THAT COMES first. Though a guy says he's succeeded doing one workout, still another might need more or less recuperation depending on genetics.
Once that's determined THEN try different programs from 6-12 weeks, that are likely to be broken down WITHIN those periods, as well.
But activity OVER all else will benefit, whether it's martial arts, swimming, biking, rowing, running, walking, climbing, intramural sports, lifting, etc, it doesn't matter. DO IT FREQUENTLY.
*Activity will burn more calories and fact. Active muscle and weight burns more than standing, stagnant muscle and fat.
*It releases hormones that trigger happiness and rid the body of free radicals floating around.
*It will erase any bad calories you have during the week.
*It burns MORE fat than just focusing on diet alone.
*It breaks you free from concern of what you eat, whereas diet leaves you as a Richard Simmons psycho, overly concerned of each morsel of food.
*It prepares you for activity, keeps you strong and nimble.
*It gives you a body to be proud of. Diet alone can't do it. And without activity, your overall body composition is constantly dependent upon what you consume daily, thereby giving you NO control over what the outcome is. In the short-run, you can determine your mainteance weight, but parties, holidays, and binges will throw you off enough to alter the APPLE CART faster than you would have it doing ACTIVITY + DIET.
*It Preserves muscle. It's misinformation that activity will burn muscle so easily. Any CALORIE deficit splits calories consumed by 75% fat, and 25% lean muscle. So if you're seeking to gain, 75% will be fat, 25% lean muscle, and perhaps some water that throws the numbers off. If you're losing, you're losing water, then fat at around 75%, and 25% lean muscle. The exact numbers are indeterminant in an absolute fashion, it's close to those %. Muscle takes MORE time to build, and to rip off. Whereas fat takes LESS time to build and rip. Altering body composition isn't entirely difficult, but it does take time to build muscle.
*Active muscle burns massive calories. Standing muscle hardly burns any. It's misinformation that muscle burns THAT much calories to turn you into a FAT burning furnace. Activity is the greatest furnace, and your ORGANS, SKIN, HEART, BLOOD, INTESTINES, etc, burn MORE calories keeping you ALIVE, than your muscle does resting. But when you USE the muscle, you're also using the organs of the body, and NOW you're burning LOTS of calories.
A-Unit