Epic
Senior Don Juan
What are your opinions about John Titor? For those of you who don't know (I never knew about him until today) in November of 2000 a man with the user name Timetraveler_0, calling himself John Titor, joined a chat and told people that he was a time traveler from the year 2036, he gave very detailed and somewhat convincing information about the future, the structure of the universe, and his methods of time travel for 5 months at which point he said he had to return to his original time.
Here is a site that contains many of the questions that people asked him and his answers. It is very interesting.
www.johntitor.com
I'm not going to say that it's impossible, because I believe that there are some things out there that are beyond our understanding based on our current knowledge of science. The more we learn the more we will be able to understand. I do not believe the story because I believe, based on the knowledge I have of the subject, that time is not exactly a concrete entity that can be traveled through. The reason I say it isn't exactly a concrete entity is because time can be seen through aging, erosion, etc. But at the same time it is merely just a way of measuring the impact of continuous small events. I might be wrong though, the whole subject of time confuses me so much, that everything I say seems wrong at the same time. If anyone can clear this up for me, feel free to do so.
Here is a site that contains many of the questions that people asked him and his answers. It is very interesting.
www.johntitor.com
I'm not going to say that it's impossible, because I believe that there are some things out there that are beyond our understanding based on our current knowledge of science. The more we learn the more we will be able to understand. I do not believe the story because I believe, based on the knowledge I have of the subject, that time is not exactly a concrete entity that can be traveled through. The reason I say it isn't exactly a concrete entity is because time can be seen through aging, erosion, etc. But at the same time it is merely just a way of measuring the impact of continuous small events. I might be wrong though, the whole subject of time confuses me so much, that everything I say seems wrong at the same time. If anyone can clear this up for me, feel free to do so.