Die Hard
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2009
- Messages
- 1,783
- Reaction score
- 404
So you guys are married... Rollo recently told me he has never cheated on his wife and I'm pretty sure Slick and Back haven't either.
My question is: Why?
Before you guys were married, you had (or would have had) absolutely no problem with spinning plates and banging several chicks at the same time. So why do you have a problem with it now? What ADVANTAGE does it bring you to be monogamous with your wife?
If it's a moral thing where you do it out of "respect" to her, then why didn't you ALWAYS adopt this attitude with other girls from the past as well? Why would you feel guilty or bad over it with this one and not with all the other girls in the past? If this is really the case of you applying a different moral code for your wife, opposed to the girls before her...it would seem like you just decided to be weak, lower your defences and allow a woman to put the ONEITIS spell on you.
Doesn't SoSuave (you guys included) teach us to make sure we stay OUT of the clutches women try to catch us in? To not let them trap us in their cage? Aren't we suposed to be OUR OWN MAN, always willing to walk away from her and make sure she is just an EXTRA to our lifes instead of the CENTRE of our life? Then why on earth would you guys eventually decide to be bound to just one woman, after all? Coz it seems to me that the very fact that you are denying yourself other great pussy, PROVES that your woman has too much control over you. Who is she to have that kind of control over your actions? Is she really THAT special? And if you think that she is...then doesn't that kinda reek of irrational ONEITIS?
If a woman has actually that much of control over a man, that he will deny his most basic instinct (to fvck women. And we all know you guys can fvck A LOT of other women if you want to, so it must be even harder for you people to restrain yourselves, not to pick up the joyful fruits that are so easily within your grasp!) for her...would it not mean that woman HAS become the centre of his life, instead of an extra? That he has handed over too much of himself to her?
Should I imagine it like this: You always felt bad about cheating on a girl and just did it anyway, but FINALLY you just had enough of it and decided this wasn't who you wanted to be (a "bad" person) and as you found a girl who seemed right for you, she allowed you to finally give into that inner wish to be a "good" (=be loyal) person after all?
Or what?
Why exactly is it that the often heard comparisons like "I love pizza but I also love Chinese...and French fries...and spare ribs... So why would I eat pizza every day of the week when I can also choose to mix it up with other great foods?" are somehow not applicable (anymore) to you guys? What makes the DIFFERENCE?
I humbly request other posters not to post in this thread until the three guys I directed my question to, have given their own answers. I want Rollo, Slick and Backbreaker to give us their genuine answers, which they came up with themselves...instead of them responding to all kinds of other ideas and theories that other posters would throw in before them. I know there are many great posters who have very wise words to speak about the subject, but please, let those three do their speaking first, then we'll take the discussion from there.
My question is: Why?
Before you guys were married, you had (or would have had) absolutely no problem with spinning plates and banging several chicks at the same time. So why do you have a problem with it now? What ADVANTAGE does it bring you to be monogamous with your wife?
If it's a moral thing where you do it out of "respect" to her, then why didn't you ALWAYS adopt this attitude with other girls from the past as well? Why would you feel guilty or bad over it with this one and not with all the other girls in the past? If this is really the case of you applying a different moral code for your wife, opposed to the girls before her...it would seem like you just decided to be weak, lower your defences and allow a woman to put the ONEITIS spell on you.
Doesn't SoSuave (you guys included) teach us to make sure we stay OUT of the clutches women try to catch us in? To not let them trap us in their cage? Aren't we suposed to be OUR OWN MAN, always willing to walk away from her and make sure she is just an EXTRA to our lifes instead of the CENTRE of our life? Then why on earth would you guys eventually decide to be bound to just one woman, after all? Coz it seems to me that the very fact that you are denying yourself other great pussy, PROVES that your woman has too much control over you. Who is she to have that kind of control over your actions? Is she really THAT special? And if you think that she is...then doesn't that kinda reek of irrational ONEITIS?
If a woman has actually that much of control over a man, that he will deny his most basic instinct (to fvck women. And we all know you guys can fvck A LOT of other women if you want to, so it must be even harder for you people to restrain yourselves, not to pick up the joyful fruits that are so easily within your grasp!) for her...would it not mean that woman HAS become the centre of his life, instead of an extra? That he has handed over too much of himself to her?
Should I imagine it like this: You always felt bad about cheating on a girl and just did it anyway, but FINALLY you just had enough of it and decided this wasn't who you wanted to be (a "bad" person) and as you found a girl who seemed right for you, she allowed you to finally give into that inner wish to be a "good" (=be loyal) person after all?
Or what?
Why exactly is it that the often heard comparisons like "I love pizza but I also love Chinese...and French fries...and spare ribs... So why would I eat pizza every day of the week when I can also choose to mix it up with other great foods?" are somehow not applicable (anymore) to you guys? What makes the DIFFERENCE?
I humbly request other posters not to post in this thread until the three guys I directed my question to, have given their own answers. I want Rollo, Slick and Backbreaker to give us their genuine answers, which they came up with themselves...instead of them responding to all kinds of other ideas and theories that other posters would throw in before them. I know there are many great posters who have very wise words to speak about the subject, but please, let those three do their speaking first, then we'll take the discussion from there.